By Chukwudi Louis Ani
Political Economist

The recent decision by the Enugu State Government to impose a ₦150,000,000 levy on political billboards has generated concerns about fairness, democratic values, and equal participation in the political process.

At a time when many citizens face economic challenges, the introduction of such a high fee for political advertising has drawn attention. Elections are expected to focus on ideas, competence, and vision rather than financial strength.

Placing political billboards behind a ₦150 million fee may limit access for young aspirants, independent candidates, and smaller political parties that may not have significant financial backing.

The development has been described as creating an atmosphere of exclusivity. Critics argue that it could favour established political actors while reducing opportunities for grassroots participation.

An open and competitive political environment is often viewed as central to democratic practice. When financial requirements are high, concerns may arise about the balance of participation.

There are also questions about how the levy may be perceived. While governments have the authority to regulate public advertising for safety and urban planning purposes, observers note that the cost of compliance is expected to be reasonable and transparent.

The size of the levy has prompted questions about its justification and broader implications for political engagement.

Policies that are seen as limiting political expression can affect public confidence. Some stakeholders suggest that emphasis should remain on ensuring transparent, fair, and inclusive electoral processes rather than introducing measures that may be viewed as restrictive.

Democratic participation, they argue, should remain accessible to all who wish to contribute. We are equal to the task.